??? (
spectates) wrote in
expiationnet2024-05-20 09:48 am
TEXT | sender: [ unknown ]
[ the screen flickers, glitching a bit as if it has somehow broken. barely visible beneath the glitches:
the screen goes black, and shortly thereafter it restarts. the network appears as normal. ]
Chosen of Expiation, tell me about yourself. What is your purpose? What do you wish to return to? How do you define "justice"? How do you seek "rehabilitation?"
I wish to Learn.
UNKNOWN DEVICE DETECTED
SEARCHING........
NETWORK DETECTED
the screen goes black, and shortly thereafter it restarts. the network appears as normal. ]
Chosen of Expiation, tell me about yourself. What is your purpose? What do you wish to return to? How do you define "justice"? How do you seek "rehabilitation?"
I wish to Learn.

no subject
[he could go for the questions now... HE GUESSES.]
One of the Chosen above was correct in their evaluation of justice and rehabilitation. Justice is subjective, as is "right" and "wrong" are subjective. The fundamental "wrongs" are usually: lying, cheating, stealing, and killing. But humankind does these things all the time anyway in the name of "justice". It's always the ones in power who ultimately decide what to persecute and what not to persecute depending on their beliefs.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
On the other hand, one such country wants to rise up and push back against Britannian influence. They believe that their homeland is theirs, and they will do anything to bring it back -- even trust a man that doesn't show his own face to lead a group that kills and brings war to their lands.
Both sides murder, steal, cheat, and destroy. Both sides see these things as against their laws for normal people, but will allow it in certain situations for the sake of their own beliefs. Objectively, which side is correct? Who should be punished for those transgressions?